
Beware Redundant Word Groups
Redundant writing is more than just saying the same thing twice. There are redundant word groups that while we may say them, are a no-no in writing. Writers are expected, at the very least, to know the meaning of words. Writers are also expected to know grammar. Redundancies are a hidden grammar mistake an editor will tag immediately. It’s an indication of sloppy writing and a lack of writing skills. Redundancies not only stand in the way of clear, concise, and coherent writing, but they are also an embarrassment. Consider these examples:
- mutual cooperation (“acting for mutual benefit.” Mutual is redundant.)
- consensus of opinion (Consensus means “collective opinion.”)
- remand back to the lower court (Remand means “order back.” Also beware of refer back and repeat again.))
- forcible rape (All rape, by definition, is forcible. Unless you are making the legal distinction between rape and statutory rape, this phrase is redundant.)
- old relic (a relic by definition is old)
- end result (result is the end—a consequence.)
I bet you can think of a lot more. Think of them but be vigilant not to write them.
0 responses on "Redundancies—A No-no For Writers"